WARNING: What
with one thing and another, I'm not able to adequately talk about
this book without going into spoilers. I apologize in advance. For my
readers who wish to avoid spoilers the short version is this book was
so bad I threw it against the wall once, and probably would have done
it numerous times. Please avoid this book.
Okay,
so I'm kind of regretting continuing with the Foundation
series. Really, really
regretting my decision to commit this whole month to the other four
books Asimov wrote relating to the Foundation
series. Let me explain. Foundation and Earth
takes place pretty much immediately after Foundation's Edge
and Golan Trevize's decision in favor of the entire galaxy becoming a
super-organism holistic entity known as Galaxia, albeit very
gradually. However Trevize is not sure why
he made that decision and seeks to have it justified by some source
of outside information. The source that Trevize selects is the
mythical origin planet of Earth, believing that there will be
something that will tell him if he made the right choice. And so with
that Trevize and friends head off into the galaxy to begin their
search.
Honestly,
if this had simply been a space adventure to find mythical
Earth-That-Was and discovering more about galactic history along the
way, I'd totally be behind it. I liked the space history aspects of
the Foundation series
in the earlier books, and I enjoyed watching the characters try to
sift truth out of the numerous, and sometimes contradictory, legends
surrounding the origin planet. Personally I found their disbelief in
a satellite as large as our moon, as well as a planet with as
impressive rings as Saturn, to be worth a few chuckles. And I will
say that this book has, more than anything else, made me want to read
the Robot series
novels by Asimov to see a first-hand non-distorted perspective of
this ancient human history.
The trouble is that
the book is not content to be just another space archeology
adventure, which I would totally be behind! The problem is that it
seems every thirty pages or so this book is absolutely determined to
get into another tedious argument over morality. I will admit that in
my own personal perspective I find arguments about morality to be
best restricted to a philosophical forum and such arguments are very
seldom well-done when it comes to fiction, often feeling very
shoe-horned into the narrative. In this particular instance Trevize
constantly gets into arguments with Bliss, Gaia's representative on
this particular little expedition, over the merits of individualism
versus Galaxia's collective consciousness. Most of these arguments
just sort of fizzle out with no real conclusion in favor of one side
or the other, which is made all the more frustrating because it means
we get to hear more of the arguments! It got so bad that I eventually
thew the book against the wall about page three hundred or so after
the sixth or seventh such argument. And keep in mind I'm a
bibliophile that finds even the slightest desecration of a book
tantamount to sacrilege, that's how pissed off the book made me.
Furthermore, the
more you think about it, the creepier Gaia's shared consciousness
gets. On the planet the trees all grow in straight lines, of their
own volition. It always rains exactly the right amount to keep
everything healthy, people only have children when it's deemed
appropriate to the balance for them to have children, basically every
aspect in respect to free will is completely taken from you.
Furthermore, everything on the planet from the birds and bees to its
molten core and the clouds are part of the planet's collective
consciousness. Even your poop is part of it! I wish I was kidding but
we are specifically told by Bliss that even her waste shares in the
consciousness of Gaia. Is anyone else creeped the hell out by that?
Because I am.
Granted, there are
extremes to free will as well, and we're shown that in at least one
very good example on the crew's adventures when they arrive on
Solaria. The Solarians are isolationists in the extreme, who can
barely bring themselves to look upon the image of another Solarian,
the idea of even being within a kilometer of another one is simply
unthinkable. The Solarians all live in robot-tended, isolated
estates, perfectly content in their “freedom” from other beings
and being free to do whatever they please. Bliss is quick to point
out that this is a result of free will and individualism, while
Trevize is quick to point out that this is an absolute extreme and is
in no way indicative of the ultimate route of individualism. I'm left
with the feeling that Asimov was trying desperately to come up with a
good reason why Galaxia represents a good choice for the future of
humanity but he keeps coming up short in the novel.
Ultimately, they do
find Earth at the end, although even Trevize wonders aloud why he
thinks he'll find an answer on Earth. (Which personally made me
wonder why we were bothering with this story anyway.) But the payoff
is just so terrible. We spend nearly five hundred pages going through
tedious moral arguments, getting dragged slowly across the galaxy and
making me personally wonder if humanity is worth saving, and you know
what the reason Trevize settles on? We need to form a galaxy-spanning
consciousness because space aliens from another galaxy might invade
us, and that's our best way to defend against them.
If you just went
“What?” you're not alone, because I'm right there with you dear
reader. Space invaders from another galaxy is your best argument?
Not, achieving harmony with the cosmos. Not, creating a higher
evolutionary state of existence. Not, effective immortality because
every part of you remains a part of the greater whole, albeit perhaps
in a diminished form. No. Space invaders from the next galaxy over.
Not even factual space invaders mind you, but potential space
invaders. I just...I can't even....
As
I've already committed to this month being another Foundation Month,
and I already have Prelude to Foundation and
Forward the Foundation,
I will be continuing my reading of the Foundation series,
albeit with ever-increased apprehension. I ardently hope that these
books will be less frustrating than Foundation and Earth
has been, but I'm not exactly sanguine about the prospect.
- Kalpar
Personally I like foundation and earth a bit. Some parts are slow annoying and drawn out and I like to simply skip over or speed read the long arguments over Gaia. But compared to the other foundation books it's fun, and involved, and is a continuation of the previous books that are much drier. Foundation series would appeal to fans of history, as well. (That was his intent too.)
ReplyDelete